| Colorado
River Litigation Gets More Contentious
A
recent decision by Federal Judge John Campbell will allow
two additional parties to intervene in a lawsuit that seeks
to incorporate better wilderness protection and discrimination-free
access for the Colorado River in Grand Canyon National Park.
Rock the Earth and its legal partners, River Runners for Wilderness
(RRFW), Wilderness Watch, and Living Rivers, filed suit in
March, 2006 against the National Park Service for being derelict
in the preservation of the river through the park.
On October
17, 2006, the judge granted permission for two other groups,
Grand Canyon Private Boaters Association (GCPBA) and Grand
Canyon River Outfitters Association (a concessionaire trade
group), to intervene in the current litigation on the side
of the federal government. Primarily at issue is the continued
mismanagement of a proposed wilderness area in Grand Canyon
National Park.
By Order
of the Judge, the case has been separated into two phases,
where the merits of the matter will be determined first, prior
to any actions or "remedies" decided in the course
of the case. RtE attorneys Julia Olson of Wild Earth Advocates,
and Matthew Bishop of the Western Environmental Law Center,
did not oppose the intervention of GCPBA and GCROA in the
remedy phase of the case. The attorneys questioned the need
to allow intervention by the river concessionaires or the
access group in the "merits" phase, since neither
group is required to enforce the laws governing national parks.
"The
primary legal issue for the court is whether the National
Park Service has complied with the laws and policies in drafting
the new Management Plan for this stretch of the Colorado River,"
said Marc Ross, Executive Director of Rock the Earth. "It
is our contention that the intervening organizations are not
proper parties to defend the legality of the government's
actions."
Both the
GCPBA and the Grand Canyon River Outfitters Association are
well funded organizations, thereby not only increasing the
stakes in this important case, but also likely to increase
our costs as we now have more opponents to battle in our effort
to protect the Grand Canyon's wilderness characteristics.
As we have stated previously, the outcome of this case has
the potential to impact how all areas eligible for wilderness
standing are treated in this country and whether motorized
transport is appropriate in such areas.
Please
help support our efforts to prosecute this important case.
Consider
renewing your membership today, or even better, to help us
grow, consider purchasing one of our holiday gifts for the
environmental rocker in your life!
»
Back
to Rock the Earth Notes
|